Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Wilson Chandler Signs Deal In China

On August 30, 2011, J.A. Adande of ESPN.com reported that Wilson Chandler stated he has signed a contract to play for Zhejiang Guangsha, which plays its games in the Chinese Basketball Association (CBA).  There are two reasons why I find Chandler's move to the CBA and the article itself to be of importance to Sports Agent Blog readers.

1. Wilson Chandler is "stuck" in China

As I discussed last week, the CBA has decided to implement a rule that effectively prevents NBA players currently under contract with NBA teams from playing in the next CBA regular season.  However, as I noted, players with NBA experience who are currently free agents will be allowed to sign with CBA teams, but will not be permitted any opt-out clauses in their CBA contracts.  Since Chandler is not currently signed to any NBA team's roster, he certainly has the right to go ahead and sign with Zhejiang Guangsha.  The caveat is that even if the 2011/12 NBA season is played (in any form or fashion), Chandler is effectively prevented from leaving his CBA team and signing with an NBA team.  It will be interesting to see if players like Chandler (who have NBA experience and are currently free agents) decide to sign CBA contracts and then make a decision to breach those contracts should the 2011/12 NBA season have a chance of being played.  Perhaps the penalty for breaching the CBA contract would be worth paying should an NBA offer come the way of Chandler or other NBA veterans.

2. Wilson Chandler is once again represented by Chris Luchey

Scroll down to paragraph 7 of J.A. Adande's article and you will read, "Chandler's agent, Chris Luchey, did not specify the amount of the one-year contract with the Guangsha, or Lions, but said it was worth less than the $3.1 million qualifying offer the Nuggets made in order to retain their rights to Chandler, and more than the $1.7 million offer that has been reported elsewhere."

On January 24, 2011, I published an On To The Next One piece regarding Wilson Chandler ending his agency relationship with Chris Luchey of CGL Sports.  Chandler later hired Happy Walters of Rogue Sports.  But apparently, at some point in time between the end of January and this month, Chandler made the switch back to Luchey.  Congrats to Chandler and Luchey on the overseas contract.

For more information on these matters, please call our office at 305-548-5020.

Read more:
http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2011/08/30/wilson-chandler-signs-deal-in-china/#ixzz1WbeqBufK


Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to
www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

He’s no Urlacher: Bears unlikely to give Lance Briggs new contract

Lance Briggs is not Brian Urlacher, and therein lies the problem in Briggs' quest for another boatload of money from the Bears.

You can attribute his difficulties in this matter to whatever you want — unfairness, organizational cheapness, even racial bias — but the fact is that Urlacher was able to crowbar a contract extension out of the Bears three years ago because he was Brian Urlacher.

"Being Brian Urlacher" means being the guy who symbolizes the franchise. It means being a man with freakish speed. It means being from the same Bears linebacker lineage that produced Bill George, Dick Butkus and Mike Singletary.

It doesn't matter why Urlacher is astoundingly popular. It only mattered that he was when he got the Bears to give him an $18 million extension in 2008.

Briggs doesn't carry that kind of weight. He's an excellent linebacker. He's also a huge comic-book fan, so we'll put it in terms he'll appreciate: In Chicago, he's more like Robin than Batman, though to Briggs' credit, Robin didn't get voted to six straight Pro Bowls.

Right now, Briggs is as good or better than Urlacher, but, again, it doesn't matter. He's not an icon, which is what Urlacher is and was and will be. If you walk around Soldier Field on game day, you'll see lots of middle-aged men wearing No. 54 jerseys. It's not a good look for people of that vintage, but try telling that to one of them.

Still three years left on deal

Briggs reportedly has asked for a new contract, even though he has three years left on his six-year, $36 million deal. If he doesn't get one, he'll demand a trade after this season, according to a published report.

Briggs almost surely will say this isn't about Urlacher, his friend, but rather about the lesser linebackers around the NFL who have recently signed nice contracts. But it is about Urlacher as it relates to making an exception.

Urlacher is the bullet-headed face of the organization. Briggs isn't. The Bears made an exception for Urlacher because he was Urlacher, with all the powerful meaning that goes with that. An exception normally is a one-time thing. There can't be a Briggs exception, unless the Bears someday want a Gabe Carimi exception, a Major Wright exception or a whoever-comes-along-next exception.

Every professional sports franchise knows that, at some point, it has to draw a line when it comes to money. Otherwise, the message is that a contract doesn't mean a thing. If it doesn't, every player who wants more money will have reason to believe his contract is written in pencil.

And every player wants more money.

Briggs turns 31 in November. That's an age when linebackers already are wearing down from the abuse their bodies has taken and given. The linebackers who have recently signed big contracts are younger than Briggs. Very few linebackers are better at 31 than they are at 27.

For the Bears, there doesn't appear to be a huge downside to saying no to Briggs on a new deal, aside from having a disgruntled player on their hands, and they're used to that with him. With his contract not scheduled to expire until after the 2013 season, he doesn't have a lot of options, other than sitting out. The Bears don't have an obvious replacement for him on their roster, but it's hard to see them backing down on this one. If general manager Jerry Angelo gives in, he's going to find many more players at his door in the next few years.

Briggs is not a victim. He's the one who signed the contract in 2008. He's the one who already has collected $13 million in guaranteed money from the deal. He already had been a three-time Pro Bowl selection when he signed the contract, so both sides agreed to the deal with the expectation that he was going to continue to be great. If he had then gone on to be a three-time NFL Defensive Player of the Year winner, he'd have a much better argument right now.

Bears made exception for No. 54

It doesn't matter that Briggs has accomplished more than Packers linebacker A.J. Hawk, who received an $8 million signing bonus when he signed a new contract in March. That's not how it works — or at least that's not how it works when it comes to the Bears and any linebacker not named "Brian Urlacher.''

What if the year was 2012 and the player demanding a new deal was Jay Cutler? Would the Bears budge with a quarterback who signed a two-year contract extension in 2009 worth $20 million in guarantees? I don't think so. Cutler might have star power, but he's not Urlacher. He's doesn't have the hold on Chicago the way Urlacher does.

In 2007, upset with having the franchise tag placed on him, Briggs said he would never play another down for the Bears. He did. A year later, he signed that six-year contract. Now he doesn't like that contract.

This time, he might not want to get his hopes up for a new deal. Or he might want to change his name to Urlacher.

For more information on these matters, please call our office at 305-548-5020.


Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com







He’s no Urlacher: Bears unlikely to give Lance Briggs new contract

Lance Briggs is not Brian Urlacher, and therein lies the problem in Briggs' quest for another boatload of money from the Bears.

You can attribute his difficulties in this matter to whatever you want — unfairness, organizational cheapness, even racial bias — but the fact is that Urlacher was able to crowbar a contract extension out of the Bears three years ago because he was Brian Urlacher.

"Being Brian Urlacher" means being the guy who symbolizes the franchise. It means being a man with freakish speed. It means being from the same Bears linebacker lineage that produced Bill George, Dick Butkus and Mike Singletary.

It doesn't matter why Urlacher is astoundingly popular. It only mattered that he was when he got the Bears to give him an $18 million extension in 2008.

Briggs doesn't carry that kind of weight. He's an excellent linebacker. He's also a huge comic-book fan, so we'll put it in terms he'll appreciate: In Chicago, he's more like Robin than Batman, though to Briggs' credit, Robin didn't get voted to six straight Pro Bowls.

Right now, Briggs is as good or better than Urlacher, but, again, it doesn't matter. He's not an icon, which is what Urlacher is and was and will be. If you walk around Soldier Field on game day, you'll see lots of middle-aged men wearing No. 54 jerseys. It's not a good look for people of that vintage, but try telling that to one of them.

Still three years left on deal

Briggs reportedly has asked for a new contract, even though he has three years left on his six-year, $36 million deal. If he doesn't get one, he'll demand a trade after this season, according to a published report.

Briggs almost surely will say this isn't about Urlacher, his friend, but rather about the lesser linebackers around the NFL who have recently signed nice contracts. But it is about Urlacher as it relates to making an exception.

Urlacher is the bullet-headed face of the organization. Briggs isn't. The Bears made an exception for Urlacher because he was Urlacher, with all the powerful meaning that goes with that. An exception normally is a one-time thing. There can't be a Briggs exception, unless the Bears someday want a Gabe Carimi exception, a Major Wright exception or a whoever-comes-along-next exception.

Every professional sports franchise knows that, at some point, it has to draw a line when it comes to money. Otherwise, the message is that a contract doesn't mean a thing. If it doesn't, every player who wants more money will have reason to believe his contract is written in pencil.

And every player wants more money.

Briggs turns 31 in November. That's an age when linebackers already are wearing down from the abuse their bodies has taken and given. The linebackers who have recently signed big contracts are younger than Briggs. Very few linebackers are better at 31 than they are at 27.

For the Bears, there doesn't appear to be a huge downside to saying no to Briggs on a new deal, aside from having a disgruntled player on their hands, and they're used to that with him. With his contract not scheduled to expire until after the 2013 season, he doesn't have a lot of options, other than sitting out. The Bears don't have an obvious replacement for him on their roster, but it's hard to see them backing down on this one. If general manager Jerry Angelo gives in, he's going to find many more players at his door in the next few years.

Briggs is not a victim. He's the one who signed the contract in 2008. He's the one who already has collected $13 million in guaranteed money from the deal. He already had been a three-time Pro Bowl selection when he signed the contract, so both sides agreed to the deal with the expectation that he was going to continue to be great. If he had then gone on to be a three-time NFL Defensive Player of the Year winner, he'd have a much better argument right now.

Bears made exception for No. 54

It doesn't matter that Briggs has accomplished more than Packers linebacker A.J. Hawk, who received an $8 million signing bonus when he signed a new contract in March. That's not how it works — or at least that's not how it works when it comes to the Bears and any linebacker not named "Brian Urlacher.''

What if the year was 2012 and the player demanding a new deal was Jay Cutler? Would the Bears budge with a quarterback who signed a two-year contract extension in 2009 worth $20 million in guarantees? I don't think so. Cutler might have star power, but he's not Urlacher. He's doesn't have the hold on Chicago the way Urlacher does.

In 2007, upset with having the franchise tag placed on him, Briggs said he would never play another down for the Bears. He did. A year later, he signed that six-year contract. Now he doesn't like that contract.

This time, he might not want to get his hopes up for a new deal. Or he might want to change his name to Urlacher.

For more information on these matters, please call our office at 305-548-5020.


Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com


Monday, August 29, 2011

Playing for a contract

Playing for a contract

By Steve Schwarz, Fantasy Sports Editor

Philadelphia, PA (Sports Network) - Sure, playing for the "love of the game" comes up in interviews with players from coast to coast, but we all know the truth - sports is a business and players are in it to provide for their families.

Therefore, a player in the final year of his contract figures to put forth 100-percent effort in order to sign that "mega-deal" or at least to keep getting paid for playing a game.

Either way, it's good for his fantasy value.

Quarterback -

Drew Brees, NO - This year's free-agent class of signal callers doesn't have many fantasy stars. New Orleans Saints' quarterback Drew Brees is already getting star money and barring career-ending injury will get the big contract after this season no matter how he performs. He likely won't do much better than last year's totals (4,620 yards, 33 TDs, 22 INTs) and, in fact, given the team's improvement at the running back position will probably have lower statistics as the team tries to balance out the offense.

Jason Campbell, OAK - Campbell doesn't have "starter-worthy" fantasy value as the Raiders will continue to play their run-first offense. Even the financial incentive of a new contract won't likely improve the team's passing game.

Ryan Fitzpatrick, BUF - Fitzpatrick was much improved in 2010, throwing for 3,000 yards and 23 touchdowns versus 15 interceptions. He and No.1 receiver Steve Johnson work well together, but the team lacks much else at the receiver spot. The Bills quarterback is a part-time fantasy starter at best and even playing for a contract won't make him that much better.

Running Backs -

Arian Foster, HOU - Under normal circumstances, Foster's contract would be a huge incentive for him to reproduce last year's fantasy statistics. But Foster has already injured his hamstring for the second time in preseason and given his contract situation may try to come back too early. Be very wary of drafting Foster No.1 overall.

Matt Forte, CHI - In the final year of his rookie deal which pays around $550,000, Forte is vastly underpaid for his performance level (1,069 yards rushing, 547 yards receiving, nine touchdowns). The team added Marion Barber to the running back group which may steal touchdowns from Forte, but no more than Chester Taylor did in past seasons. Forte should continue to produce good receiving statistics and be a very good PPR league running back. If he stays healthy, he'll almost certainly produce numbers better than his late second round ranking (fantasyfootballnerd.com ranking 20)

Frank Gore, SF - His agent is Drew Rosenhaus which means negotiations won't be easy. But Gore has stated that he wants to stay in San Francisco and the No.1 thing he has to do to get that "fat contract' is play everyday. He hasn't played in all 16 games since his breakout season of 2006. This would be the perfect season for him to replicate that year's statistics (1,695 rushing, 485 yards receiving, nine TDs) and don't be surprised if that happens.

Adrian Peterson, MIN - Peterson has a veteran quarterback under center which can only help his performance this season. Offensive coordinator Bill Musgrave wants to use him in the passing game too. Now add the financial incentive and "All-Day" should post the best numbers of his career. Given his ability to play every game (missed just three games in four years), Peterson should be the No.1 overall selection in your draft.

Ray Rice, BAL - All the factors lead to Rice having a career year. He's durable, the team let the touchdown-stealing Willis McGahee sign with Denver replacing him with Ricky Williams and Rice has the best hands of any running back in the league. If it's possible for a No.5 overall pick to be undervalued, then Rice is a bargain.

Peyton Hillis, CLE - Hillis, like Forte, will be paid around $550,000 this season and if he posts last year's numbers (1,177 yards rushing, 477 yards receiving, 13 TDs) will get the "big money." His backups, Brandon Jackson and Montario Hardesty are both question marks from a heath standpoint, making Hillis at No.26 a likely candidate for one of those huge "contract years."

A few of the other "contract year" candidates include; Ronnie Brown, Michael Bush, Tashard Choice, Ryan Grant, BenJarvus Green-Ellis, Tim Hightower, Marshawn Lynch and Mike Tolbert.

Wide Receiver

Danny Amendola, STL - Amendola has looked very good in preseason and was already a "mini" Wes Welker last season with 85 receptions. He needs to break a few of them to improve on his 8.1 ypc average and then he'll be a huge bargain given his ranking of 146. Don't be afraid to take him in the 11th or 12th round, particularly in PPR leagues.

Dwayne Bowe, KC - Bowe has always had superior talent, it's just that like many "prima donna" wideouts he doesn't show it every game. With offenses primed to stop Jamaal Charles and the addition of Steve Breaston and talented rookie Jonathan Baldwin, Bowe could produce "monster" numbers.

Marques Colston, NO - The mind may be willing, but the knees are probably going to prevent Colston from having the big "contract year" statistics. With all the receivers that Brees has to chose from, if Colston isn't 100-percent. his numbers may actually go down, not up.

DeSean Jackson, PHI - Jackson wants a mega-deal and based on his production in both the passing game and special teams he deserves it. This one could go either way. His lack of practice could lead to injuries during the season and the Eagles have brought in Steve Smith as insurance. On the other hand, if he stays healthy, he and Michael Vick could produce a lot of big plays.

Steve Johnson, BUF - Sometimes it's better to be the No.2 receiver and get one-on-one coverage with the oppositions' second best defender. We will see how Johnson produces now that Lee Evans is gone and he's the primary focus of the secondary. Of course, with few other options, Johnson could end up being a top-5 in targets which would mean a huge year.

Mario Manningham, NYG - Manningham ended 2010 with three consecutive 100+ yard performances and will take over the starting spot opposite Hakeem Nicks. He should be ready to produce "Steve-Smith type" numbers, meaning 85-90 receptions and 1,000+ yards. Given his sixth-round ranking (72) he should be a huge bargain.

Other "contract year" candidates at the receiving position include; Braylon Edwards, Pierre Garcon, Vincent Jackson, Brandon Lloyd, Robert Meachem, Jordy Nelson, Plaxico Burress, Mike Sims-Walker, Mike Wallace, Reggie Wayne and Wes Welker.


For more information on these matters, please call our office at 305-548-5020.



Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com





Saturday, August 27, 2011

Judge Nelson puts official end to NFL legal battle

The legal fight between the NFL and its players is officially over.

U.S. District Judge Susan Richard Nelson in St. Paul, Minn., issued an order Friday that formally dismissed the antitrust lawsuit brought against the league on March 11 by a group of players headlined by New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady. The lockout began the next day and lasted 4 ½ months. The new collective bargaining agreement was signed on Aug. 5.

Nelson wrote Friday that the owners and the players "have at all times acted with the utmost integrity and in the best interests of football."

The regular season starts on Sept. 8 when the defending champion Green Bay Packers host the New Orleans Saints.

By The Associated Press

For more information on these matters, please call our office at 305-548-5020.



Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com





Friday, August 26, 2011

Waiver deals offer teams options

On Sunday afternoon, the San Diego Padres retired the No. 51, honoring baseball's all-time save leader, Trevor Hoffman. Hoffman earned 552 of his record 601 saves during his 15-1/2 seasons in a Padres uniform.

On Monday, the Padres put Hoffman's replacement, Heath Bell, on waivers. In the midst of his fifth year in the organization, and the third year he has spent as Hoffman's ninth-inning replacement, Bell has become an elite closer, having earned 126 saves, including 35 in 39 opportunities this year.

Take a look back at the amazing career of all-time saves leader Trevor Hoffman.

On Wednesday, the defending world champion San Francisco Giants, in the midst of a two-game series against the Padres and Bell, were awarded the waiver claim. Speculation began as to whether a deal could be finalized by the Friday deadline for a decision on the claim to be made.

And Thursday, word surfaced that the Padres had decided to keep Bell, at least until season's end. The Padres likely feel the offseason promises a potentially better return, even if means draft-choice compensation for losing Bell to free agency, rather than what the Giants can offer.

By Friday, the talks will officially end.

That's baseball in the 21st Century.

There are moments to embrace the past, but they are fleeting because the reality of the challenges facing franchises today can't be ignored. Major League Baseball has rules against teams discussing players placed on waivers, even after they are claimed, but word regularly leaks out. With the new world of social media, word spreads in a hurry.

Here's how waivers work. A team places a player on waivers, and other teams have two working days to decide whether to place a claim. If multiple teams claim the player, the team with the worst record, regardless of league, is awarded the player. The two teams then have 48 hours to work out a deal or the original team is allowed to withdraw the player from the waivers. A claiming team cannot withdraw its claim.

That's part of the hang-up with Minnesota moving Jim Thome. Thome has a no-trade clause and can block any deal he doesn't like. Speculation is Thome would want to move only if he could be reunited with Charlie Manuel, the manager in Philadelphia, but the Phillies have baseball's best record, which means the other 28 teams all would have had to pass on Thome for him to wind up in Philadelphia.

Now, a team can put a player back on waivers a second time in August, but if it does, the player is automatically awarded to a team with the proper waiver claim.

It's not like Bell was an isolated case this week, much less this month.

At the same time that Bell was wearing a Padres uniform, staring across the field at AT&T Park, wondering if he were about to swap dugouts and the uniforms, Wandy Rodriguez was starting for the Houston Astros at Coors Field against the Colorado Rockies, wondering if he were about to face his future team.

The Rockies were awarded the waiver claim on Rodriguez on Wednesday and were willing to assume the $37 million contract obligation for the left-hander, but unwilling to give up the quality of prospects the Astros also demanded. And so when the Astros flew from Denver to San Francisco, where they open a four-game series Thursday night, Rodriguez was aboard the plane.

Understand, far more players are claimed on waivers than are ever dealt following the July 31 deadline to trade players without needing waivers, and the gyrations teams go through during the waiver period have been complicated in recent years by the high-dollar, long-term contracts players receive.

A claiming team has to beware.

That lesson was drilled home back in 1998. Teams have not forgotten the lesson of then San Diego general manager Kevin Towers, who claimed left-handed reliever Randy Myers from Toronto because he wanted to block postseason rival Atlanta from adding a lefty. Towers got stuck with Myers, who turned out to have a bad arm, and the Padres got stuck with more than $15 million in salary for Myers, who worked 14-1/3 innings in the final weeks of 1998 and never threw a big-league pitch again.

There, however, also are stories that have happy endings.

A year ago, for example, the Giants were blocking San Diego from acquiring Cody Ross in a waiver claim from Florida. The Marlins, however, didn't care where Ross went as long as they cleared his salary off their books, so they allowed the Giants' claim to go through. It wound up being a godsend for San Francisco. Ross was a key to their world championship, earning MVP honors in the NLCS.

What teams are hoping to do when they put a player on waivers during August is take advantage of a saturation of names on the waiver wire, slip a player through waivers, and then have flexibility later in the month in case a contender has an unexpected need.

In placing a waiver claim, teams are either making pre-emptive bids to block a player from going to a rival, or trying to take advantage of a team's desire to move the player.

Detroit got what it wanted earlier this month when it acquired outfielder Delmon Young from a Minnesota team that could no longer live the lie that it could get back into the American League Central race.

For the Giants, the claim of Bell turned into a dual-purpose gamble. The Giants did want to block him from Arizona, who went into the week with an edge on the Giants in the NL West. Kevin Towers, the general manager who brought Bell to the Padres from the Mets, is now the Diamondbacks general manager, and has an uncanny knack for building a bullpen. In the meantime, though, the Giants also lost their own closer, Brian Wilson, because of an inflamed right elbow.

The Padres had no problem making a deal within the division, but the Giants, never shy to make a deal with the intention of winning now instead of worrying about the future, have drained the top quality out of their farm system. Remember, the Giants dealt their No. 1 prospect, pitcher Zach Wheeler, to the Mets last month for outfielder Carlos Beltran.

Colorado, meanwhile, saw the chance to claim Rodriguez as a means to filling a rotation void not only for this year, but the next two or three. The Astros, after all, were shopping Rodriguez before July 31, but indications were they pulled out of potential deals because teams such as the Yankees would not take enough of the $36 million that Rodriguez would be guaranteed for 2012-14.

The Rockies know that luring a free-agent pitcher to Coors Field is a challenge, and they also know that this year's free-agent market will be weak in terms of pitchers, which made Rodriguez that much more attractive, even if his contract is inflated for a middle-of-the-rotation pitcher.

The Rockies tested whether their willingness to take on the contract would satisfy the Astros. Colorado wasn't about to give up prime prospects along the lines of left-hander Drew Pomeranz and catcher Wilin Rosario, who were the targets in Houston

The Padres, with Bell, and Astros, with Rodriguez, however, both figured they would find better offseason markets than what they could get in deals this week.

Bell could be a free agent, but by offering him arbitration, the Padres would receive two high draft picks as compensation if they lost Bell. Rodriguez is under contract, but given the shortage of pitching talent that will be on the open market this offseason, the Astros are willing to gamble that Rodriguez' value will rise as teams looking to shore up their rotation come up empty handed on the free-agent market.
 
By, Tracy Ringolsby
 
For more information on these matters, please contact our offices at 305-548-5020.



Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com

Thursday, August 25, 2011

AP Sources: Bruce Pearl hit with multiyear penalty

AP Sources: Bruce Pearl hit with multiyear penalty

By BETH RUCKER AP Sports Writer

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (AP) - People familiar with the situation say the NCAA is hitting former Tennessee men's basketball coach Bruce Pearl with a multiyear show-cause penalty, but the Volunteers program will not face additional sanctions beyond what it self-imposed in response to charges of 12 major violations.

The show-cause penalty means any school wanting to hire him must go before the NCAA to explain why and could face penalties.

Pearl's three assistants were hit with one-year show-cause penalties, a person told The Associated Press on Wednesday on condition of anonymity because the school had not announced the NCAA's decision.

The Vols football and basketball programs were accused of major recruiting violations, and Pearl acknowledged last September he lied to NCAA investigators during an interview.

Tennessee docked Pearl's and his staff's salaries and limited their recruiting before firing them in March. Tennessee imposed a two-year probation on itself and additional recruiting restrictions on the basketball and football programs.


For more information on these matters please call our office at 305-548-5020.


Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com

Bankruptcy | Sports Law | All Criminal Cases | Traffic | DUI Defense | Family Law


Wednesday, August 24, 2011

The Titans would be crazy to give Chris Johnson a huge contract

Chris Johnson continues his holdout with the Tennessee Titans. And the two sides may be as far apart as ever.

Johnson wants to be among the highest-paid players in the NFL. Peyton Manning recently signed a new deal with the Indianapolis Colts that will pay him $23 million this season. The Titans have agreed to make Johnson the highest-paid running back. Adrian Peterson currently holds that distinction, as the Minnesota Vikings will pay him $10.7 million this season. Complicating matters, is the eight-year, $120 million contract signed this weekend by Larry Fitzgerald of the Arizona Cardinals that will pay him $15 million per season.

But should a team ever give a top running back top dollar? Only if they like gambling.

Johnson has 4,598 yards in his first three seasons. Below is a look at the eight players since 1990 that had at least 4,000 yards in their first three seasons. What we see is that the decline in their careers started shortly after their quick starts.

Of the other seven running backs, they combined for five seasons with at least 1,500 yards in the six seasons after their first three years. And while those running backs averaged 1,422 yards in their fourth season, that average fell to 1,016 in year five. And by year eight, this group averaged less than 1,000 yards per season.

For more information on these matters, please call our office at 305-548-5020.

 

Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

China says no to Kobe, other NBA players under contract: Fan reaction

China could be a promising destination for the NBA's elite.

Unfortunately, most of the league's top players will not be able to play there, according to the Chinese Basketball Association. As reported by ESPN.com, NBA players under contract will be barred from playing in the CBA. This means that the speculation of Kobe Bryant(notes) going to play in China can officially be put to rest.

China was an attractive destination for the superstars of the NBA due to the possibility of expanding their brand in a populous, relatively new market. Now, they must look elsewhere to accomplish this. Europe should now become the focal point of many players looking to play as this lockout invariably continues.

Free agents would be allowed to play in the CBA should they choose, but they must play an entire season if they sign with a domestic Chinese team.

What does this move imply? It could display some solidarity between the NBA and CBA, who undoubtedly have become closer in the wake of seeing notable Chinese players come and showcase their talents in the NBA. It could also show that China does not consider its league to be a farm system to the NBA, where players can simply tune up for the big show and then bolt when the time comes to play once again.

Other leagues around the world may follow suit, but it will take quite some time for this development to have any real effect on the ability of the NBA's work stoppage to affect the employ-ability of its players outside of North America.

Let's see where the globe stops spinning this time around as we look to see where Kevin Durant(notes), Kobe and the boys may end up next.
 
By Michael C. Jones
 
For more information on these matters, please call our office at 305-548-5020.


Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com




Monday, August 22, 2011

Goodell's foray into disciplining collegians noble, but is it legal?

College athletics are like Gotham City without Batman. There are not enough cops to contend with all of the criminals, so the punks run the place with impunity.

Not only are the forces of truth and justice vastly outnumbered, but their rules are ridiculously archaic and their jurisdiction is a joke. By the time the NCAA has completed its investigation of the noxious mess at the University of Miami – the latest and most salacious of college sports scandals – many of the perpetrators will have found sanctuary, either in professional sports or in some other career that permits payment for services rendered.

Most of them are hiding in plain sight, athletes who have systematically cheated the system but left campus in time to elude the alligator arms of NCAA law; people like Reggie Bush and, to a slightly lesser extent,Terrelle Pryor.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell's decision to suspend Pryor for the first five games of his professional career can be perceived as both poetic and vigilante justice, as an abuse of power, as punishment by proxy, as a narrow and needed precedent, as a strategic pre-emptive strike, and as all of the above.

While professing to be protecting the "integrity of the eligibility rules for the NFL Draft," Goodell has made the unprecedented move of suspending a player the league has yet to employ. Goodell has granted Pryor's request to enter the supplemental draft, but on the condition that the former Ohio State quarterback start his professional career with a five-game suspension identical in length to the one he avoided by leaving school before the 2011 season.

On some levels, Goodell's sentencing feels about right. One of the reasons Pryor's NCAA suspension was postponed until after Ohio State played in the Sugar Bowl was that the player had pledged to return to campus and serve his punishment. Breaking that pledge in the face of mounting evidence of impropriety is like fleeing the country to avoid extradition. It's not the kind of conduct that should be rewarded.

Yet inasmuch as the NFL and the NCAA are supposed to be autonomous entities – separate if not equal -- Goodell's move may be susceptible to legal challenge. It is surely a concern to those who have previously believed the NCAA's statute of limitations expired as soon as a player left campus.

Thursday, agent Drew Rosenhaus indicated Pryor was prepared to accept the suspension. Friday, attorney David Cornwell indicated he would pursue an appeal once Pryor signed a pro contract. The National Football League Players Association was consulted on Goodell's decision, but its ultimate position is not yet plain.

"This is uncharted waters," said James McCurdy, a visiting professor of sports law at the University of San Diego. "If the NFL justifies its position, it will be upheld on the basis that the NFL is protecting its own rules and its own integrity, not that it's enforcing the NCAA's rules.

"This ruling is specific to the Pryor case, but the NFLPA would be concerned with the extra-jurisdictional (implications). If the commissioner can sanction this player for violating NFL rules, then he can sanction other players (for conduct preceding their NFL careers)."

On some levels, this is obviously objectionable. Though the NFL depends on college football as a cost-free farm system, any arrangement between the two bodies that controls the flow of players smacks of collusion and invites antitrust scrutiny. If Goodell is carrying water for the colleges, then, he had better do it unilaterally, surreptitiously and infrequently lest some higher court find him out of line.

The trouble is that the colleges are poorly equipped to carry this water on their own. They yearn for Goodell (and his basketball counterpart, David Stern) to help police practices that have overwhelmed their local enforcement efforts. If Goodell is willing to play Batman, they'd gladly chip in for the cowl, the cape and the utility belt.

Grant Teaff, executive director of the American Football Coaches Association, enthusiastically welcomed Goodell's punishment of Pryor and told NFL.com his organization has specifically lobbied the NFL to sanction players who leave school without serving NCAA suspensions.

"We all have a vested interest and trying to work together is extremely important," Teaff told the web site. "This is an important issue, and from my standpoint, I feel the NFL has handled it properly."

No surprise there. College coaches generally crave control and they recognize that a single non-conforming player can mean probation and/or unemployment. They want a strong deterrent to rules-breaking, even if those rules reflect indentured servitude rather than a free market. They know that with the possible exception of Joe Paterno, no coach in the country was more entrenched and revered than was Ohio State's Jim Tressel before he was caught lying to cover for his infraction-causing quarterback.

Since Tressel's forced "retirement," the idea that Pryor could drop out of school and escape accountability made for disturbing collateral damage. Unlike Bush, Pryor had no Heisman Trophy to forfeit, and he had already demonstrated his respect for tradition by trading much of his Buckeyes' memorabilia for discount tattoos.

On some levels, Pryor deserved to be disciplined. Whether Roger Goodell was entitled to impose that discipline could be a question for the courts.

Written by
Tim Sullivan

For more information on these matters, please call our office at 305-548-5020.


Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com




Friday, August 19, 2011

NBA Can't Let Lockout Get In Way Of Huge New TV Contract Five Years Away

By Jonathan Tjarks - NBA Contributor

The NBA is five years away from a new national TV contract that should provide a huge boost to annual revenues. Letting the lockout stem the league's growth puts that pot of gold in danger.

Aug 18, 2011 - The debate about the actual extent of the NBA's operating losses and the viability of its financial model has been at the root of the lockout. But from the outside, getting a completely accurate reading on the books of 30 different NBA franchises is nearly impossible.

What we do know is this: the league's financial trajectory will look a lot different in 2016, the next time its TV contracts can be negotiated, than it does now. Even in the midst of a stagnating economy, sports TV rights have been skyrocketing since the NBA last signed deals with TNT and ABC/ESPN in 2007. TV networks value live programming now more than ever, and the NBA, with its ability to produce polarizing stars with broad cultural appeal, is in an excellent position to take advantage.

The TV habits of the average American have changed drastically in the last decade. With DVR technology increasingly popular, people can automatically record any TV show they want and watch it at their convenience. The traditional model of broadcast TV was delivering millions of people in captive audiences to advertisers; if people can fast-forward through your ads, they are by definition not "captive audiences".  

Sports, because they are mostly watched live, are immune to the DVR effect. They are one of the few places advertisers can be sure that people will be watching. This is even more pronounced among the younger tech-savvier crowd, whom advertisers covet: in 2010, 99 of the 100 highest rated TV-telecasts among the 18-49 year old demographic were broadcast live. (Sporting events and shows like American Idol fit that definition.)

Sports rights are even more important for cable channels. A good percentage of the money channels make come from charging "carriage fees" to providers for offering their channel. The more people value your channel, the more TimeWarner or DirecTV will pay you. ESPN charges $4.25 a subscriber, almost $3.25 more than their nearest competitor.

Carriage fees are one of the main reasons why Monday Night Football was moved to cable. ESPN can charge cable companies a lot more because they are offering a product that can't be found elsewhere. In the age of Netflix and other low-cost entertainment options available from your couch, showing re-runs of Law & Order isn't the draw it used to be.

These twin driving pressures have exploded the value of sports TV rights in the last few years, and the effect of this new pool of money can be most seen in college sports. Last year, the ACC signed a $155 million annual broadcast deal with ESPN, doubling its annual media revenue. A few months ago, the Pac-12 signed a $250 million deal with ESPN and Fox.

Colleges and conferences have been scrambling to maximize this windfall. The Pac-10 initially tried to lure the entire Big 12 South to form a super-conference called the Pac-16, in an effort to combine the TV markets of California and Texas. A year later, Texas A&M has scrambled the pot again, attempting to join the SEC, partly out of jealousy for the creation of "The Longhorn Network", an ESPN-run channel devoted exclusively to arch-rival UT's sports programming.

Having popular sports programming legitimizes a channel, and the appeal of UT football is what prompted ESPN to invest over $300 million in the network. In the huge TV markets of Dallas, Houston and San Antonio/Austin, ESPN is trying to make cable providers put the Longhorn Network on a basic tier of channels, forcing every cable subscriber, even the ones who don't like sports, to pay for it.

Similarly, the NBA's presence on TNT, including huge media events like the Eastern Conference Finals, gives the channel a lot of leverage in negotiations with carriers. Forbes magazine estimated that the NBA would earn at least $1.2 billion a year in a new TV deal, more than 30 percent higher than the current $900 million. If the NBA had signed a five-year deal in 2007, as was customary, rather than the current 9-year arrangement, they could have made up a huge portion of their operating losses in TV negotiations.

For all the talk of how big stars joining together to form super-teams would destroy the league's smaller markets, the presence of LeBron James and Dwyane Wade in Miami has driven TV ratings higher and made the league a much more attractive commodity. And if the owners were really serious about competitive balance concerns, they would make revenue sharing in TV deals a part of CBA negotiations, so that the interest LeBron drives to the sport benefits all 30 franchises more equally.

Because of the importance of championships in determining a player's legacy, the NBA has the benefit of story-lines that can stretch out for over a decade. Whenever a new star emerges, the question becomes: can they be as good as MJ? Does LeBron have the heart to win a championship? Will Kevin Durant take his place instead?

Kobe's won five championships, but because he's being measured against MJ, his quest for his sixth title is as compelling as his quest for his first. It's a natural made for TV storyline involving "villains" and "good guys" that the other sports, where there's less focus on the individual, lack.

The NBA has a bright economic future. The worst thing it could do is give itself a self-inflicting wound by poisoning its relationship with the players and damaging its popularity when there's a pot of gold right down the road.
 
Fore more information on these matters, please call our office at 305-548-5020.


Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Amid Miami Hurricanes Football Scandal Congress Should Enact Tough Sanctions Against Sports Agents

The latest in an ongoing series of major college sports scandals now finds former Miami real estate mogul Nevin Shapiro in the eye of a storm regarding his involvement as a Miami Hurricanes Booster who provided millions of dollars in cash and benefits to Hurricanes football players. In an exhaustive investigation conducted by Yahoo Sports, Shapiro outlined an exhaustive list of players, coaches and school administrators who were aware of the nefarious activities. The investigation will undoubtedly sully the reputation of one of the most dominant football programs of the last quarter century, if it does not gut the program completely through NCAA sanctions up to and including the Death Penalty, which would shut the program down for a determined number of years. The NCAA has only implemented this penalty once, in the 1980s, when the then dominant Southern Methodist University program was gutted for similar violations. For the record, SMU has yet to return to football prominence.

It seems as if barely six months passes without another college sports scandal garnering national headlines. In 2006, Oklahoma quarterback Rhett Bomar was forced to leave school after participating in a "no show job" scheme. Last year, Reggie Bush was forced to relinquish his Heisman Trophy after it was revealed that he received hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal benefits from a would-be sports agent while enrolled at USC from 2004-2006.

Earlier this year, Ohio State University Coach Jim Tressel resigned amid a scandal involving illegal benefits, including luxury cars for star players, including quarterback Terrell Pryor, who many believed was a leading candidate for the Heisman Trophy this fall. Speaking of the Heisman, last year's winner, Cameron Newton, played despite persistent rumors that his father, Cecil, shopped his services during recruiting to Mississippi State University for $180k.

And lest we forget North Carolina Chapel Hill, where Coach Butch Davis was fired last month because several players were accused last year of, again, accepting illegal benefits from would be agents.

Davis, ironically, recruited several star players implicated by Shapiro while serving as Miami's coach during the early 2000's. The list of the accused reads like a slate of future Hall of Fame candidates, including the late Sean Taylor, who dominated from his free safety position for the Washington Redskins, and Vince Wilfork, the All-Pro defensive tackle for the New England Patriots.

While Shapiro's story consists of mere allegations at this point, as the old saying goes, "where there is smoke, usually there is fire." Perhaps the better cliché is "cut off the supply and reduce the demand." Or, better yet, harshly punish both the supplier and the demander.

As federal investigators sort through Shapiro's information to determine whether any federal indictments will be handed down, it is clear that Congress must enact legislation that creates stiff criminal penalties for individuals who serve as runners for agents, as well as the agents themselves who cause so much trouble.

While Shapiro is in prison, the truth is that there are dozens of other Shapiro's that are actively plaguing a major college program near you or actively seeking to get a foot in the door. Perhaps the prospect of serving 20 years in prison will do just the trick in slowing down the agents and their goons who care less about the sanctity of amateur athletics.

And let's be clear, those athletes whose greed places themselves and their institutions at risk should be forced to pay a penalty, too. Most of those implicated probably are sitting smug in the belief that nothing can happen to them as they have moved on to the professional ranks. Perhaps the NFL and NCAA should join forces and consider long-term suspensions without pay—or even banishment from professional football for the most egregious offenders.

The excuse that most of these young athletes hail from poor backgrounds is just that—an excuse, as there are thousands of poor young men and women matriculating through colleges and universities across America who don't have the benefits of tutors, free tuition and training table for meals.

And while the idea of major college athletes receiving a stipend seems reasonable, the ones earning tens of thousands of dollars from shady agents and boosters would consider any stipend a mere pittance anyway. It is this ilk that must face harsh sanctions. If the NCAA and the NFL are serious about rooting out such corruption, such draconian measures must be implemented, or else we will realize that talk of reform is just that—talk.

Author: Chuck Hobbs

For more information on this matter, please call our office at 305-548-5020.

 



Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com



Wednesday, August 17, 2011

National Assembly passes sports law that regulates sponsorship

National Assembly passes sports law that regulates sponsorship

Representatives of sports leagues are waiting for the regulations of the law

 

Sports sponsors have not completed negotiations with professional teams and they will not do so until the regulations of the law are approved (Photo: Nicola Rocco)

Country
Venezuela's National Assembly made on Monday the final reading of the Organic Law of Sports, Physical Activity and Physical Training, as lawmakers endorsed the 89 articles of the law, after they amended 49 articles. The new law will be sent to the Supreme Tribunal of Justice (TSJ), which will ratify its organic nature.

Article 68 was one of the most controversial articles of the law, as it was not supported by the professional sports leagues because it does not include sponsorship agreements that had been previously established.

Héctor Rodríguez, the minister of Sports, said to the representatives of the basketball, baseball, and soccer leagues that their proposals would be taken into account in drafting the regulations of the law.

By, Samir J. Jiménez P.

For more information on these matters, please call our office at 305-548-5020



Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

NBA stars face roadblock to play in China

The Los Angeles Lakers' Kobe Bryant(notes) has offers north of $1.5 million a month to play in China, and sources say he'd be inclined to accept a contract except for the one immense hurdle standing in his way: Chinese Basketball Association officials will likely pass a rule in the middle of this week forbidding the signing of players with NBA opt-out clauses.

Bryant is the biggest star deep in negotiations with China, but he isn't alone. San Antonio Spurs point guard Tony Parker(notes) has been engaged in serious talks, too, sources tell Yahoo! Sports, but it won't matter if China lays down legislation that could be crippling to the signing of NBA stars.

Chinese officials want to derail the prospect of rent-a-players for the lockout. That would leave a far smaller pool of NBA free agents available to sign, and those players will have to commit to playing a full season in the Far East. If the lockout ends, they can't return to the NBA until the Chinese season ends in mid-March.

The NBA has a cozy relationship with China, a partnership worth a great deal of money for both sides. Privately, some agents and officials wonder how much the NBA could be influencing China to steer clear of players under contract. With the European market so lean, China offers NBA stars the best chance, the most leverage, to recoup a fraction of the money they'll lose once the checks stop coming in November. For all the mistrust of NBA commissioner David Stern and the owners, there are still people who say the Chinese Basketball Association isn't fond of Stern, and wouldn't let itself be pressured, or swayed, by him.

No one knows for sure. Through it all, agents are confused over how rigid the ruling could be, because some Chinese owners have privately insisted they could find ways to creatively structure contracts to get around it. Even amid the murkiness, everyone is still in holding patterns with Chinese teams until the meeting this week.

"There's a wild West quality to that league," one prominent agent said. "It's still hard to rule anything out yet."

Shanxi has been the most aggressive Chinese team in pursuing NBA talent, sources said, and has made players offers of well over $1 million per month. As one agent who recently visited officials in China told Yahoo! Sports, "I think there are five or six $750,000-plus jobs left right now, and most teams will offer between $40,000 and $100,000 a month to NBA players. Every team will sign a U.S. center, and half of them a point guard, and half a wing player."

Bryant's stature and popularity make him unique, and teams have shown a willingness to meet his demands to play in China. Nike is motivated to get him on the floor, too. Bryant pushes product in the Far East, perhaps unlike any of his peers. Bryant believes he can be patient, wait for these Chinese and European markets to unfold, and make a decision about playing overseas on his own timetable.

Several agents told Yahoo! Sports quality unrestricted and restricted free agents are asking them to find jobs in China. Several players who could command free-agent deals north of $20 million, even $30 million, when the lockout ends are privately telling agents they're willing to sign in China without opt-out clauses. That's a high-risk move, especially when an injury playing for $1 million, or less, could cost a player tens of millions later.

The primary reason why is simple: Despite the years of union warnings, there are still players largely living paycheck to paycheck. And now, there's a genuine fear within the player ranks that the season will be wiped out completely, and they might be better jumping overseas sooner than later.

Even so, there aren't enough good jobs available to truly give the players a great deal of leverage in talks with the NBA. The owners believe they can get the players to crack in November and December when the checks stop coming, and that's why they won't make many, if any, concessions in the one-sided collective bargaining agreement that the league has offered players. Yet the NBA loves that China and Europe are pushing hard for Kobe Bryant and the NBA's biggest stars to make the lockout leap overseas. There isn't much the players can do to create leverage in this lockout, and after that meeting later this week in China, there could be even less.
 
By Adrian Wojnarowski
 
For more information on these matters, please contact our office at 305-548-5020.



Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com

Bankruptcy | Sports Law | All Criminal Cases | Traffic | DUI Defense | Family Law



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and /or attorney-client privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.




Monday, August 15, 2011

Re: Vic’s Picks: Real Madrid



On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:36 AM, front desk <fd@molawoffice.com> wrote:
Being a basketball fan, the recruiting aspect of the game can be somewhat ridiculous when they start ranking the top seventh and eighth graders, yet it doesn't really surprise me. That's why when earlier this week Real Madrid signed a seven-year-old to a contract the surprise and shock factor was minimal. Nowadays everyone has to one-up everybody else. Apparently Real Madrid watched this kid, remember he still is one, a couple times and was impressed by his skills at that age they had to sign him. There's no question the team is taking a huge risk. He may end up being one of the greatest soccer players ever to play or he'll be known as a flop. Whatever the outcome may be, Real Madrid has everyone beaten, until someone decides to nab a six-year-old.
 
by Victor Rodriguez
 
For more information on these matters please call our office at 305-548-5020
Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com

Bankruptcy | Sports Law | All Criminal Cases | Traffic | DUI Defense | Family Law



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and /or attorney-client privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.







--
Sincerely,

Tatiana, Restrepo, Front Office Manager
From the Law Office of Yoel Molina, P. A.
Office: 305-548-5020
782 NW 42nd Ave, Suite 343, Miami, Fl. 33126 in the "Ocean Bank" Building


Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Got a traffic ticket in Miami -Dade? go now to www.miamionlinetrafficattorney.com

Bankruptcy | Sports Law | All Criminal Cases | Traffic | DUI Defense | Family Law



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and /or attorney-client privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.