Friday, December 30, 2011

Sion take legal action against FIFA


GENEVA: Swiss club FC Sion revealed on Thursday that they have launched a legal action in Zurich against FIFA as their off-field battle with world football's governing body continues. 

The club's action is against FIFA's executive committee, who recently threatened to expel theSwiss Football Association (ASF) and all member clubs unless they punished Sion before January 13 for breaching player recruitment rules. 

Sion have accused FIFA of "unacceptable blackmail" for attempting to force the ASF to take action that would "run contrary to their own rules and to Swiss law." 

"The club cannot tolerate seeing other Swiss clubs taken hostage by FIFA," read a statement published on Sion's website. 

On Tuesday, Sion urged the ASF to appeal against FIFA's threatened suspension, and said that "sacrificing" the club to satisfy FIFA would show a lack of courage and put in doubt the ASF and the Swiss Football League's ability to continue managing Swiss football. 

The row erupted after Sion, the subject of a FIFA-imposed transfer embargo over the signing of Egyptian goalkeeper Essam El Hadary, proceeded to sign six players in the summer. 

The club then fielded five of the six players during a Europa League play-off tie against Celtic earlier this year and were kicked out of the competition as a result, with UEFA's decision to expel them upheld by the Court of Arbitration for Sport

For additional information on these matters, please call our office at 305 548 5020.


Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"


Sports names and faces: Rick Pitino, Geoff Ogilvy

Rick Pitino

Louisville's basketball coach says when his current contract ends with the 2016-17 season, that's it. "When you're 59, you're realistic that you don't have a whole lot of years left," Pitino said, throwing a chill into Baby Boomers everywhere. "My contract's going to run out in 2017. I'm not coaching any more after that." The only coach to lead three schools to the Final Four will be banking $3 million in base salary the next two seasons, then $3.9 million a year until his contract expires, so he should be able to scrape by in retirement - as long as he steers clear of one-night stands in Kentucky restaurants.

Geoff Ogilvy

The Australian U.S. Open winner, who has also won three World Golf Championship events, sees a lot of similarities between his sport and surfing. "A lot of surfing is just sitting on the back of your board and just enjoying the place you're at. You can do it with friends or on your own," said Ogilvy, who described himself as a "splash-in-the-water kind of surfer." Ernie Els doesn't see it that way. "You see a wave that big coming at you," said the Big Easy, pointing to a 30-foot tree. "I don't see how you can enjoy your environment. ... No, golf is not like surfing. You don't get killed playing golf."

For more information on these matters,please call our office at 305 548 5020.
--

.
--





Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Fired Illinois assistants, administration in contract dispute

By Pat Forde

When the bowl matchups were announced earlier this month, the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl looked like a prime candidate for the worst matchup of them all.

The New Year's Eve game features 6-6 Illinois, riding a six-game losing streak, against 6-7 UCLA, given an NCAA waiver to compete despite a losing record. Both schools fired their coaches. Both are playing under interim leaders.

Since then, the bowl has defied the odds and somehow gotten worse. UCLA has four players ineligible for the game, including backup quarterback Richard Brehaut. Illinois has two players ineligible for the game, including leading rusher Jason Ford.

More From Pat Forde

Now comes news of a rather contentious contract dispute between several Illinois assistants and the school administration.

In January 2010, several new assistants were hired by then-coach Ron Zook and given two-year contracts that would roll over each year, documents obtained by Yahoo! Sports show. Two-year deals for assistants are considered a luxury of stability, and initial agreements were signed. But during the summer of 2010, shortly before Illinois opened camp, those assistants were given a formal contract to sign that contained a clause that wasn't in the original agreement.

It stated: "In any Contract year ending after January 31, 2011, either party may terminate this Contract effective at the end of the Contract year by giving written notice of termination to the other party no later than 60 days prior to January 31 of the current contract year."

Some of the Illinois assistants signed the formal contract without checking the fine print to make sure it squared with what they were told when they first were brought onboard at the school. But even if they had balked at the clause, their options were limited at that point – they had arrived at Illinois seven months before and there were no other jobs available.

After the 2010 season – a successful one by Illinois standards, ending with a 7-6 record and a Texas Bowl blowout of Baylor – a source close to the assistants said they were assured by Zook and then-athletic director Ron Guenther that their two-year deals rolled over. That helped curb interest in job-shopping last offseason, even though some had received inquiries about going elsewhere. And even during a steadily more disappointing 2011 season, the source said the coaches were told by Zook that they had contractual security heading into 2012.

[Huguenin: Grading the first-year college football coaches]

That assurance proved wrong when they – along with Zook – were given termination notices from the school in recent weeks. Since then, the coaches have been battling the school, at first on their own, then through lawyers. There was even a brief concern that the affected assistants would quit before the bowl, but those fears have been allayed even if the hard feelings have not.

New athletic director Mike Thomas, who inherited the contract situation, acknowledged "a disconnect" between the school and the assistants. But Thomas, who replaced the retired Guenther in August, has drawn a hard line.

"We're living by the language of the contract that was signed by those coaches," Thomas told Yahoo! Sports on Monday. "We basically told the coaches that."

A source close to the affected assistants acknowledged that their case was weakened by having signed the contracts. But just when you thought Illinois couldn't find another negative issue heading into this bowl game, it has one: a dissatisfied and distracted lame-duck coaching staff.

For more information on these matters,please call our office at 305 548 5020.--

Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

'Rarity' Fielder remains unsigned


By Derrick Goold
--

If a team potentially interested in free agent Prince Fielder wonders how his power production compares to Harmon Killebrew or how his durability ranks with Pete Rose, Ichiro Suzuki and newly announced Hall of Famer Ron Santo, all that team has to do it ask.

Agent Scott Boras has a stat for that.

An annual rite of the offseason is the Boras Binder (patent pending perhaps). It arrives sometime before Dec. 1 each winter like baseball's answer to an Advent calendar, complete with a goodie on every page. The binder is a sleek three-ring snapper with industrial-grade aluminum covers and a Boras Corporation logo stamped into the corner. This winter the prized binder is a 73-page treatise on Fielder. There is also a binder for Boras client and former Cardinals pitcher Edwin Jackson, and two winters ago a 60-page binder for Matt Holliday circulated baseball and lauded his value as a free agent.

Boras described the binder as a way "to educate" the market on his client, and he told ESPN.com that the goal of the research inside is to answer a question, "What does he mean to a franchise?"

Christmas has come and gone and Fielder remains the best talent still available this winter almost three weeks after his rival for free-agent affection, Albert Pujols, signed a record deal. This is not unusual for Boras' biggest client. Holliday didn't complete a deal with the Cardinals until the first week of January in 2010. Boras plays the market deliberately, often dealing directly with ownership and fastening a tight lid on talks. The Washington Nationals and Baltimore Orioles are two teams believed to be courting Fielder, with others like the Chicago Cubs and Texas Rangers playing coy or playing off their interest.

'A RARITY'

A few days after leaving the winter meetings on Dec. 8, Boras joined Fielder on an eight-day road trip, according to Yahoo Sports. The duo canvassed potential homes for the lefthanded slugger and home run king. Fielder, 27, has the luxury of being choosy, especially as Boras bills him as a rarity.

"He's not even at his peak yet," Boras told a clutch of reporters in a lobby of Dallas' Hilton Anatole on the final full day of the winter meetings. "He has Albert Pujols-type numbers and those aren't even his premium years. Albert Pujols is the best hitter we've seen since (Barry Bonds). You're definitely going to have something that is a rarity in the game because he's so young and you can project five years ahead. Normally when someone (signs) a free agent, you're not getting that many prime years."

Enter the Binder.

Boras has had his staff produce binders for clients for the past decade, including one for Alex Rodriguez before he signed a record 10-year, $252-million deal with the Texas Rangers. He is not alone in such glitzy presentations. In 2010, the agents for Carl Crawford sent interested teams an iPad loaded with video and multimedia information on the Gold Glove Award-winning outfielder. One wonders if a general manage feigned interest to score an iPad. Other agents offer packets that stress their client's off-field activities because stats are readily available online or in a pack of baseball cards.

The 73-page booklet on Fielder has been given to interested general managers and select members of the media in an attempt to, as Boras explained, educate. The binder is a trove of statistical euphoria, color photos, and historical comparisons. As the market for Fielder meanders toward the new year it offers a peek at how Boras packages his client, but also on the market at large and what agents — in this case a super agent — feel teams value.

The binder contains glorious statistical factoids:

• Only three Hall of Fame first basemen had as many as 200 home runs by the age of 27: Jimmie Foxx, Orlando Cepeda and Killebrew. Fielder has 230.

• Fielder is the seventh player to hit 32 home runs or more in five seasons by the age of 27. The others: Miguel Cabrera, Eddie Mathews, Pujols, Rodriguez, Foxx and Vlad Guerrero.

• Pujols and Fielder are the only players with at least 32 home runs in each of the past five seasons.

• Fielder hit a home run that reached a velocity of 119.2 mph, the highest of any homer this past season, according to ESPN Stats.

• He is the only player to average .280 with more than 40 homers and at least 100 RBIs from 2007 to 2011. (Not mentioned: Pujols averaged .324, 39 homers and 114 RBIs in that same period.)

"You see who has as many home runs by the age of 27 at first base and you see Jimmie Foxx and Lou Gehrig and the list is only four guys," Boras explained this month. "You have to double-check. Then you start looking at what accomplishments this man has had at such a young age. You look at the game and the younger core that's coming and you'd say there's no one (like Fielder). You're going to have to average 37 home runs in this period of time. Who's going to do that?"

In just those few pages mentioned above, it's clear how Boras has positioned Fielder not just against history but against this market. Most of the stats described in the book are mentioned alongside the player's age, positioning Fielder's 27 against Holliday's 31, Cabrera's 28 or Pujols' 31. Pujols, the other premium hitter available this winter, is mentioned in passing several times. But it's clear the Binder shows what Boras tells: that Fielder, 5 years younger than Pujols, is built for a long-term contract because he's coming into his prime.

'BUILT FIELDER TOUGH'

Those are some of the statistical superlatives, and they're meant to wow in addition to illustrate. The Binder also reveals some of the selling points that teams value, that teams bank on. In Holliday's binder, one of the nine sections was titled, "Durability and Athleticism in the Outfield." In Fielder's, one of the nine sections is simple identified as "Built Fielder Tough." Both address the player's reliability and health through the course of their career and season.

Holliday, his binder says, was one of four outfielders to log 1,200 defensive innings from 2006 to 2009. This past season, Fielder joined Cal Ripken Jr. and Santo as the only players with more than 950 games played from age 22 to 27. Fielder is one 10 players with 959 games during any six-year span, alongside Santo, Ripken, Ichiro, Dale Murphy and Rose. Holliday's binder included an action photo of him in the weight room alongside a quote from teammate Troy Tulowitzki about Holliday knowing "what to do to get out of a (hitting) funk."

Simply put, durability pays.

Teams need to know about it to do the same.

Boras made the point this month that Holliday was drawn to the Cardinals and he encouraged Kyle Lohse to stick with the Cardinals because of the presence of Pujols. Fielder is a franchise player with a similar gravitational pull, Boras said.

A long-term contract for a star player helps "attract players to a franchise," Boras said.

To that end, Fielder's binder describes the protection he provided National League MVP Ryan Braun. Holliday's binder delves deeper into the potential business boost, illustrating how the Cardinals' attendance jumped 2,000 fans per game after the Cardinals added him for the playoff push in 2009. That information is juxtaposed with promotional work, hardware like Silver Sluggers, and charitable endeavors like the floor plan for the "YMCA Fielder Dugout."

BEHIND THE NUMBERS

Statistics are only the gateway information for teams who have such things as slugging percentage, home run rate, and ballpark factors at their fingertips. Most teams have analytic departments whose job it is to provide info on free-agent targets. The Binder, despite its industrial packaging, offers a glimpse of the person behind the numbers and thus strikes at the real qualities team sign: durability, future production and, in the case of a franchise player, intangibles.

Oh, and age.

Fielder's age is the spine of his Binder, and it also gives him an unusual spot in the market. As Boras said at the Winter Meetings, the interest in his client varies from teams on the verge of competing to teams expecting to compete three years from now. The offers for Fielder reflect those differing statuses, Boras said. His age creates an interesting detour that this market could take for Fielder: the shorter, higher-priced deal. Fielder could take a five-year deal with a higher average value than Pujols' $25.4 million, still set a record and reach free agency again at 32, Pujols' age next season.

That way the once-in-a-decade player that Boras describes would be available to the highest bidder twice in the decade.

"When you start to analyze, you realize we have a decade player," Boras said. "He's a rare kind."

Proof is in the Binder.

For more information on these matters,please call our office at 305 548 5020.




Friday, December 23, 2011

Five lawsuits that will change sports

The NCAA paid out a whopping $5 million in legal fees last year, and while that may seem like chump change to an organization that just inked a TV deal that will pay it $10.8 billion over the next 14 years, it's also a sign of the troubles the organization is having defending its notions of amateurism. 

Of course, the NCAA isn't alone in facing legal challenges that could change the sports landscape. From a drug case that is headed to the Supreme Court to an Olympic battle centered on a sex aide called ExtenZe, here are five cases that could become game changers in the very near future.

1. O'Bannon v. NCAA

Why should a sports figure give away his likeness, just because he once played in college? That's the question that former UCLA basketball star Ed O'Bannon is asking in a lawsuit that could reshape the way college sports is marketed.

The NCAA argues that it doesn't license student images, just games. But in February, a federal judge shocked the organization by refusing to have the suit thrown out.

Now, 11 more ex-players have signed on with O'Bannon. Meanwhile, Sam Keller, the former Arizona State quarterback and 2004 Sun Bowl MVP, has opened up a second front on the video game company Electronic Arts, asking for his cut of the proceeds for the use of his image. The same judge who sided with O'Bannon combined their suits with six others to create a monster challenge to the NCAA's marketing hegemony.

"This litigation has gotten to a point that has to be troubling for the NCAA," says Vermont Law School professor Michael McCann. "No previous lawsuit that I know of has advanced to this stage. It elevates the possibility of a verdict where the damages are astronomical. Potentially any retired athlete whose image has been used by the NCAA after they graduate is part of this class."

Considering EA's NCAA football franchise just released its 18th game, there won't be any shortage of names to put on the plaintiff list.

2. Agnew v. NCAA

Video games may be the least of the NCAA's problems. Former Rice DB Joseph Agnew startshis federal court attack on its 37-year-old practice of giving one-year scholarships by saying, "This suit arises out of a blatant price-fixing agreement between member institutions of the NCAA."

Agnew's beef is that the NCAA is preventing schools from offering guaranteed full rides to recruits who are at a constant risk for injury -- as he was when he needed multiple surgeries his junior year at Rice. When the Houston private school cut him from the football team in his junior year, he appealed its decision to take away his scholarship. Agnew won, but he also had to shell out $33,000 to pay for his senior year.

Agnew is seeking the right to sue on behalf of all other students in the same boat, saying the costs of a full education are improperly inflated by the one-year rule. And he's got company. The U.S. Justice Department's antitrust division is snooping around the issue.

Is the era of the guaranteed four-year scholarship around the corner?

3. German Tennis Federation (Deutscher Tennis Bund) v. ATP

Two years ago, the promoters of a German tennis tournament marched into a Delaware court to complain that the ATP, the world's tennis body, had no right to shuffle their event to a B-list spot on its schedule. Their argument was that the league, which has offices in Florida, shouldn't be above American antitrust laws.

They didn't do very well. A jury found that the ATP had every right to set its own schedule. What's the alternative? Chaos?

No, the promoters say. Fairness. In September, they filed this appeal to the Supreme Court, insisting that the ATP is illegally dominating the market for players.

What changed to make them think they have a chance now?

In March, the Supreme Court ruled that the NFL could be sued by a clothing company upset about being locked out of its massively insular marketing machine. What the cases have in common, lawyers for the GTF say, is the principle that leagues should be able to be sued for the rules and policies they set.

Gabriel Feldman, director of the sports law program at Tulane University's law school, thinks that it's unlikely the Supreme Court will hear the case. Still, if the high court bites, he'll be interested in seeing whether the ATP -- or for that matter, the PGA, Olympic sports or any of nonunionized leagues -- will be given the same deference as the NFL to set its own rules.

"The Jets and Giants have to agree to play each other if there's going to be a Jets-Giants game," he says. "But tennis and golf tournaments don't have to reach the same agreements with each other. You can make an argument that their structures are different. And you can make an argument that the way they're treated in the courts should be, too."

4. Williams v. NFL

When Minnesota Vikings DT Kevin Williams went to his local drugstore to buy the diuretic StarCaps before the 2008 season, he couldn't have fathomed that the purchase would make him a central figure in a Supreme Court case.

But that's what happened when he failed a drug test for bumetanide, a banned substance that wasn't on the product's label. The NFL took the case all the way to the Supreme Court, asking it to void a Minnesota court ruling that found it violated local law when it took more than three days to notify Williams of his positive drug test. Minnesota also requires that an employer give an employee the right to explain the positive test, whereas the NFL doesn't accept excuses.

The NFL tried arguing that its collectively bargained drug policy would be upended if it had to hew to the laws of each state where it does business. (In fact, only two other states, Maryland and North Carolina, have drug laws that could be considered in conflict.) The NBA, NHL and USADA, along with MLB, filed supporting briefs.

Monday, the Supreme Court refused to hear the NFL's appeal. In a statement, the NFL replied: "The decision does not address in any way the merits of the claims made by the players, which have been rejected by every federal and state court to consider them."

The ruling ensures that Williams and another teammate who also tested positive, DT Pat Williams, get to play out the season. But the NFL is worried about a lot more than those two players. The way league officials look at this, today it's the league's drug testing policy that is coming under fire.

What's around the corner tomorrow? Its concussion policy?

The NFL isn't without options. It can take the narrowest route and go back to the Minnesota court to argue that its policy isn't actually in conflict. (That's probably the most likely scenario.) Failing that, it can also ask the state's legislature to carve out an exemption specifically for athletes.

But neither will achieve its larger goal. That's why the league is also lobbying Congress to pass a law that will give its collective bargaining agreement priority over any state laws that conflict with it. The problem, say critics, is that would literally put the NFL above the law.

5. USADA v. LaShawn Merritt

A lot of Olympians are eyeing the recent arbitration decision in the case of LaShawn Merritt, the reigning 400m Olympic gold medalist, which left him banned for 21 months for three positive drug tests. The panel gave Merritt leniency because it found that his elevated levels of testosterone came from his purchase of ExtenZe, a sexual performance aid that he bought at a 7-Eleven store.

The arbitrators also ruled that that Merritt should be eligible for the London Olympics when his ban ends, since "enhancing his sports performance was the last thing on Mr. Merritt's mind when he purchased ExtenZe."

Trouble is, their influence ends on our end of the pond.

The International Olympic Committee issued a curt response to the decision, saying Merritt shouldn't bother packing his bags. "The IOC rule states very clearly that any athlete sanctioned for six months or more will be banned from participation in the next edition of the Games," IOC spokesman Mark Adams told The Guardian.

Los Angeles-based defense attorney Howard Jacobs says the rule is ripe for challenge in the courts. "The rule is arbitrary, and there are dozens of Olympic hopefuls who are watching how this case will play itself out in terms of someone challenging the IOC," he says.


For more information on these mattters, please call our office at 305 548 5020.




Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"


Boxing Commission lays down the law

 By Buster Laing
--

Special to The FN

The Bahamas Boxing Commission was in town recently and the full Commission came to do business here in the second city, and high on the agenda was to put to rest once and for all, any questions about the Commssion's role in a popular boxing/entertainment event which is held at a popular night club.

The event has become one of the hottest boxing tickets in town.

The event is dubbed "Fight Night."

One of the aspects of the event that has made it so popular is that it features female boxers.

"We are in Freeport to educate and inform those persons who are contemplating holding a boxing match and advise them that there are rules governing the sport of boxing in The Bahamas, and that they are to consult with the Bahamas' Boxing Commission because there is a process for a fight to be promoted, " said Chairman of the BBC, Pat Strachan.

"We are not here to be offensive, we are just here to educate and inform and we would like those persons to get in contact with The Bahamas Boxing Commission, so that they may be advised on the requirements to promote a fight in the Commonwealth of the Bahamas."

The Boxing Commission consists of seven individuals from various backgrounds. They are Pat Strachan (Chairman), Fred Sturrup (Secretary), Dr. Munir Rashad (Medical Committee chairman), Officials Committee Chairman Fernley Palmer, Commissioners: James Tynes, Paul Moxey, Richard Deveaux ...are all of the Commission.

Dr. Rashad, who chairs the medical committee said unsanctioned events can be "extremely dangerous" and Professional boxing in The Bahamas requires prefight physicals, a doctor at ringside, verified weigh-ins and other types of inspections.

"With so much things happening in Grand Bahama we figure that it is almost necessary now and then to come into Grand Bahamas and pass on rules and regulations and educate the people of rules and regulations they may not be familiar with on a regular basis," said Secretary Fred Sturrup.

"We have found out that there have been some boxing matches and promotion of boxing matches and we really don't think that the ones who are promoting the event are keenly aware that in 1990 the Boxing rules Act came into play and that it is the law of the land."

According to Sturrup, whenever you contravene the Boxing rules act you could be fined a minimum of $150.00 or more or you could be imprisoned for as much as three months if these events are not sanctioned by The Bahamas Boxing Commission.

"It is not a demanding process for the event to be sanctioned, but it is just what has to be done because the rules of the law of the land are established to ensure that the people's rights are protected and if those persons who want to promote professional boxing should be advised by persons in the Ministry of Youth, Sports and Culture office namely Steven Burrows and Monique Leary.

"They can give you the information you need on having the event sanctioned," said Sturrup.

"We want people to attend the event, but we also have an obligation to ensure that those persons who participate in the event are protected and there is as much safety as possible.

"That is one of the reasons why the event must be sanctioned. BBC will ensure that everything is in place and the matches go on according to the rules and regulation."

How high is this on the Royal Police Force agenda with the nation's crime rate and murder rate at an all-time high?

"What we do is that we don't make the laws but once it is on the books and we find out that anyone or any organization is in breach, then we would then advise them on what the law says," said RBPF Inspector Kenry Stubbs.

"The books and all laws are readily available and if you are in breach of the law, we would not hesitate to enforce the law if we have to."

Fight Night is really just for adult entertainment. As such, is this really a big deal?

"It is not a big deal, it is just that we are mandated by the MOYSC to take care of our responsibilities and our role is to monitor professional boxing in the country.

"We are not picking on people in Grand Bahama and when people are promoting boxing in New Providence, they also have to get it sanctioned," said Sturrup.

"Otherwise the police will be there and close down the event, but people don't need to be afraid of it. Just come and sit down with Steve or Monique at the M.O.Y.S.C. office because it is a simple process because we want to partner with the ones who are promoting theses events and encourage their activities."

What other problems do you face?

"Another role of the Commission is to ensure that the promoters pay the judges, referees along with the fighters. In the past the boxers and promoters sign a contract and the promoters depend on the gate proceeds and if they fall short, we have a problem," said Palmer.

"The boxers then look to the Commission for their pay; we had to put a stop to that. So the policy now is that the money must be in escrow first and as long as the Commission sanctions the event and you agree to pay the fighters, the money must be paid two weeks in advance."

The Cabinet Office under the Ministry of Sports announced the appointment of the current Bahamas Boxing Commission in July 2007.

Note: According to Chapter 385 of the Boxing Control Rules (1990):

Section 8 (a): Any person who without being duly licensed in accordance with the provision of these rules, hold, assist in holding or take part in any boxing contest shall be guilty of an offense and liable on summary conviction to a fine of one hundred and fifty dollars or to imprisonment of three months or to both such fine and imprisonment.

If we didn't know, now we know.

For more information on these matters,please call our office at 305 548 5020.
 
Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Buffalo Sabres owner acquires France AllPro Athlete Management

Buffalo Sabres owner Terrence M. Pegula announced Dec. 6 that he had acquired France AllPro Athlete Management.

NFL player agent Todd France will remain as President and CEO of the company, whose name will not change. Additionally, the firm will add Bryan Ayrault, a certified NFL contract attorney formerly of Ayrault Sports Agency, backed by Pegula.

As one of the youngest and most successful NFL agents, France represents more than 50 NFL players including Ray Rice, Dwayne Bowe, Vernon Davis, Karlos Dansby, Takeo Spikes, Marcell Dareus and Prince Amukamara. France has also represented multiple first-round draft picks, negotiated over $1 billion in contracts, and received the Sports Business Journal's "Forty Under 40" award for the most promising sports executives in 2006.

In a press release, France said "Having the support of a professional sports organization owner as powerful and successful as Terry gives us unlimited potential for growth and new opportunities for our existing and future clients. My clients are more than just athletes, they are businessmen, and Terry, who is a member of the Forbes 400, gives my clients access to the ultimate businessman."

Pegula said in a press release that he looks forward to "joining forces" with France after years of competing against one another.

Pegula bought the NHL's Buffalo Sabres for $189 million in February 2011.

For more information on these matters, please call our office at 305 548 5020.

Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoelmolina_mo
Faceback page: www.facebook.com/lawofficeofyoelmolina
Linkedin profile: http://tinyurl.com/linkedinpagemo
Blog: http://tinyurl.com/molawblog

"Turn to us when you need help"